tiny lemmy 

Percentage of Each State Taken Up by Corn Fields

c/map_enthusiasts · u/The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world · 309 points

Open external link


Comments

u/MintyFresh@lemmy.world · 2 points

Drainage and flood risk. Chicago is basically a swamp. Idk about every lot, there's probably ridiculous tax loopholes and kick backs, etc what with it being Illinois. But there's a lot of shit land in and around Chicago

u/Kolanaki@yiffit.net · 3 points

I definitely see more corn than all of those other things combined. And it's not even for human consumption; it's for the cows.

u/RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 7 points

If you’re referring to CA, it’s % of the entire state. Think of how much of CA is arid, mountainous, or otherwise unsuitable for corn or other agriculture.

u/Comment105@lemm.ee · 4 points

You're probably seeing mostly grapes, tomatoes, cotton and cannabis, as well as grains that aren't corn?

u/phorq@lemmy.ml · 1 points

It's roughly 13%, looked up a more recent map because I was curious about the "garden state" I grew up in. I know we're the most densely populated but not even 2% seemed surprising with how many corn fields I pass by while driving.

https://brilliantmaps.com/percentage-corn-fields/

u/adhocfungus@midwest.social · 1 points

Having lived in Iowa, the number honestly feels a little low. I guess the soybeans have to grow somewhere.

u/MutilationWave@lemmy.world · 6 points

One of them certainly shouldn't exist. The fact that that area is split into two states is only to have two more Republican Senators.

u/MutilationWave@lemmy.world · 1 points

It's funny that they need all those dirty tricks when they already have the massive electoral college advantage.

And then all that pales in comparison to people not voting. Needs to be mandatory like Australia. Send in a blank ballot if you're so against it but you *will* do it.

u/PriorityMotif@lemmy.world · 2 points

I just have been looking at numbers on election night or something.

There's still a lot of States that were extremely close and if it weren't for death by a thousand cuts, then Republicans would have no chance of winning. They have to have alll the voter disenfrachising, spiking the 2020 census in blue states, and all the other dirty tricks in order to win.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvglg3klrpzo

u/MutilationWave@lemmy.world · 2 points

I find that interesting yet hard to believe.

I tried to search for the info but Google is failing me and I'm too lazy to click a bunch of States on an interactive map.

u/PriorityMotif@lemmy.world · 2 points

I was just looking at some of the recent voting data by state and one of the southwestern or Western states was only 6k votes from electing Harris. I think there were only about 100k votes total. Maybe it was Oklahoma?

u/PriorityMotif@lemmy.world · 0 points

Not really. There's a bunch of tiny rural counties with less than 10k people in them that are. Most places are full of normal people. You forget that a lot of people don't vote, many other people don't understand what they're voting for. Most people wouldn't want anything to do with the Republican party if they understood their policies.

u/shalafi@lemmy.world · 5 points

Never been to Chicagoland? Every empty field is filled in with corn. Smash a gas station flat? Now it's a cornfield.

u/disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world · 4 points

I only found Minnesota and Illinois as consistently Democratic voting states. What’s the third?

Edit: I just saw Delaware.

u/FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 0 points

still majority yes, but also minnesota is a solid blue state. It’s maybe like a 75/25 split which isn’t that radical.

In fact, of the yellows, there are 3 Democratic, 2 Swing States, and 5 Republican.

u/modifier@lemmy.ca · 15 points

Multiple counties in Illinois voted in favor of exploring secession from the state because they don't like how Chicago turns the state blue. It would definitely be a red state without us.

u/billygoat@catata.fish · 8 points

Yeah, 10%, 20%, and 37% should each be ~~buffet~~ different colors.

Damn autocorrect

u/stupidcasey@lemmy.world · 27 points

Could you imagine living in Hawaii and not having readily available corn fields? How would I do all my corn field based activities?

u/Xbeam@lemmy.world · 19 points

Hard to believe there is no data on corn fields in the home state of the Corn Palace.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_Palace

u/bestagon@lemmy.world · 16 points

This makes me wonder what the map creator considers a green amount of corn to be lol. 100%?

u/atro_city@fedia.io · 13 points

I don't agree with the color choice. Green would've been much nicer.

u/FlyingSquid@lemmy.world · 11 points

Indiana Beach commercials did not lie to me after all!

![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f6fd2587-a43d-43f4-9647-722f31e3f0ff.png)

u/Kolanaki@yiffit.net · 7 points

Really? Only 0.4%?

Because it sure feels like there's way more corn here than that.

u/shalafi@lemmy.world · 5 points

Having lived in Chicagoland, what are the corn growing incentives there?! Every empty field in the city is full of corn. Seems smart.

u/yuri@pawb.social · 2 points

ayyyy lifelong nebraska resident here! you can absolutely tell if you ever drive through here, shit’s ALL farmland.

u/neidu3@sh.itjust.works · 2 points

As a foreigner, based on my road trip from Houston to Port Fourchon in Louisiana, I would have thunk those two percentages would've been substantially higher. Especially Louisiana.