tiny lemmy

u/LifeInMultipleChoice

Joined

Posts

Comments

5 points ·

It also only hurts them directly if it goes weaker though right? From an outside perspective I would understand them moving to the Euro just to simplify things, but I also think being a part of the EU has more effects than being a unified economy. It helps with travel, that's good. But it also makes a country dependent and can void the entire principle of laws fairly easily.

Hypothetical, let's say a country like Hungary isn't following the civil rights laws required to be part of the European Union. Does the EU try to squeeze them economically to make them act in a manner the rest of the Union demands, or do they settle and say, well they are their own country and we have no say there, so our rules aren't really laws, but mere suggestions. Where do these suggestions draw hard lines, and if you hit a hard line what stops the country from printing their own currency back out and just telling the EU to fuck off. Does the EU not allow them to do so because their currency would thereby be unbalanced? Or do they allow them to under the condition they trade all their currency out somehow?

Some things could get dicey I imagine.

9 points ·

Out of curiosity, why would that matter to most people? I don't live in Europe so I'm just curious. Is it just about wanting them to use the same currency because they seem posh about it or something? On their end I assume the look at it and say our money's worth more. (Why I fabricated the idea of posh being a possible reason for debating for/against)

147 points ·

Seems like they are setting Hegseth up to take a few falls to consolidate blame.

8 points ·

I just saw an article about Trump accusing someone of possible treason for criticism.

https://lemmy.world/post/28001455

We'll have to see how it plays out.

8 points ·

Not to mention those trained people mentioned above attempting to move here have to fight deportation for checks notes, coming here on a work visa, having a tattoo, speaking your mind, not being white. Hard to say really.

30 points ·

How is it just blamed on "the west". China, India and other "Eastern" countries are in the UN as well. Would you not have to say it just shows they care nothing about the international community and it is really about their control and power as well? The world is watching executions around the world, and people are just being censored to/from it by their governments. Israel's biggest trading partner is China by far, almost twice the U.S. Not any huge press from them about stopping.

5 points ·

While I understand the point, won't this just make politicians run on lies even more?

-1 points ·

No, it'd have to ensure France. Which means if they struck France could nuke Moscow. If. Anyone in Russia gave a shit, they'd slaughter Putin's family now.

How else do you save those lives

11 points ·

Well clearly we haven't been efficient enough in starting conflicts with China. We need to find ways to hurt our trade with them even further

0 points ·

That was the Senate not Congress, but yes those are the numbers. The Senate holds terms 3x longer than Congress and thus do not represent their constituents as accurately. They are a not proportionatly representing the population which is why many believe they should be reformed. (1 member represent less than 600,000 people in one state, while another member represents ~19,000,000 people.). Their votes both count as 1.

So while the majority of Democrats now have an unfavorable view of Israel, where as in 2022 the majority had a favorable view, this takes much longer to get representation in the Senate. Are there representatives that vote against their constituents beliefs, sure. But when a change happens that fast it is very hard for a Representative based government to be able to move fluid enough to represent what the people want vs the payment checks coming from their campaign funders.

A dictatorship is not the answer, but we need voting systems that get accurate representation of the majority of the population much more efficiently. Unfortunately that would make us more of a democracy and the oligarchs don't want that. Because we would vote to better the majority and shrink the wage gaps. Which inevitably makes it harder for them to control the media when they don't have as much money to buy all of it. Making more voting go to help the people and not their pockets.

-1 points ·

Yes support for Israel was bipartisan. With minority support of Congress to not support Israel.

-1 points ·

Biden refused to break the law. If you want legislation to change taxes it has to go through Congress. It was 50 Republicans 2 independents and 48 Democrats for the first half and then 51 Republicans, 2 independents and 47 democrats in the second half of his administration. To fundamentally change things you either can do so legally by having majority support or illegally by overthrowing the government. Impeachment also takes at least 50% of Congress to file the articles. If Biden actually did something illegal he would have been impeached, yet while Republicans voted 50/51 against anything that mattered, they never could get all 51 of them to agree with impeachment, because Republicans were the ones who had to have agreed on EVERY piece of legislation that passed during his administration or it wouldn't have passed. Saying he was currupt was always a publicity stunt.

21 points ·

France is the only reason the U.S. won the American Revolution.

13 points ·

Every war they've ever declared. They just haven't declared war since WW2

22 points ·

I think that's the point. Bullying/Threatening countries and then "asking" them for help. Then if they don't oblige he uses it to booster support for the bullying and threats. Similar ordeal with cutting aid to Egypt and then asking them to take something like 1.5 million people in from Gaza that Trump doesn't want on their homeland.

6 points ·

Yes, the Catholic Church "provoked" Henry VIII to murder his wives as well. Or maybe when you choose to murder people you are still accountable for murdering them.

It's like saying "I told my ex who still lives in the neighborhood they can't be friends with any new men, and she did it anyways so I blame it on the men for provoking me and I went over to her house and tried to strangle her to death."

"I'm innocent, it was the new friends that made me do it"

7 points ·

So every U.S.Billionaire is alive because the drug and gun cartels in the U.S. by this logic right? Being that the company is a telecom company, it would be directly comparable to saying AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, and so on are all tied to illegal cartels and not just use legal lobbying that shouldn't be allowed.

-1 points ·

edit: responded to wrong comment

6 points ·

So where are you moving?