tiny lemmy

u/silence7

Joined

Posts

Comments

1 points ·

You're assuming that the world is covered in server racks. I don't expect anything like that, even with significant increases in datacenter construction.

Let's assume 1kw per person. 10 billion people at peak population some time hence. So about 150 billion m^2^ to provide 1kw per person 24/7. The earth's surface area is 510.1 trillion m², of which about 1/3 is land. So we're probably just fine on renewables.

62 points ·

Nothing people do has zero impact. But pretty much everything else has a bigger one. Coal will utterly destroy the land, and the gases emitted after it burns will destroy far more.

Solar like this on a few percent of the land will supply all the electricity people need. So it looks huge, but is surprisingly low-impact compared with other options, or things like raising cattle

13 points ·

They mass imprisonment and cultural destruction is a more recent phenomenon. China first spent several decades bringing in colonists and executing those who complained too loudly.

16 points ·

Meanwhile, in the real world

![](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/0590af41-0db5-4542-a2e1-8ca944f8d88b.jpeg)

24 points ·

The New York Times has been covering Uyghur issues since 2001.