u/iAvicenna

mean while kicking farmers out? good luck

Well because the EU realises that if you increase tariffs then people pay the price (or variety of goods they can buy comfortably decreases)

That's what you get for siding with fascists. People will never learn.

"I inherited a lot of power and connections from my parents, I must be a god"

More like enemy of men, both of youse

How is it sick and vile to say all kid deaths are equally sad? I would think that it is more sick and vile to think that a kid's death is worse than other kids' deaths because of where those kids are from. There is no blame here but against those who don't speak up against war mongerers and people who willingly serve them.

This is just as sad as thousands of kids who died in Palestine or those who witnessed their loved ones torn to pieces right in front of their eyes. No more, no less.

Well thanks to Orban they are focusing on the important matters like who has sex with who so they should get better soon

Oh no I am fully on board with this. But it still boils to the same source of governments serving the interest of the rich rather than the remaining people. Airplane companies pushing agendas and asking for government incentives while governments say they really care about the planet but not making enough effort to make train travel cheaper (international per mile especially) than flying. Fucking hell they should incentivize the hell out of it so that it becomes cheap as chips and people take flights only for long distances. So yes commercial flights are definitely also a part of the problem.

If you compute it per person I suspect a billionaire is probably producing (just due to flights) about 10000 to 50000 more than an average traveller (couple international flights a year).

Well I am glad I can buy a CEO 10 meters of flight time. My estimates is that our collective world wide yearly efforts can just about earn our top 100 richest turds their annual flight pollution.

Thanks for the calculation. Sounds about right, according to the link below the top of the ladder billionaire flies about a couple hundred times a year and consumes about 2000 tonnes of fuel. So the fuel consumption you calculated is about 70 billionaires. It is generally true that the top hundred richest people in the world consume/obtain about as much resources as the rest of the world so that calculation is believable.

https://carboncredits.com/the-curious-case-of-top-ceos-private-jet-emissions/

So that if Trump goes after 4 years and is replaced back by a democrat he is going to turn back to democrat voters and tell them "look I sent women to space, I am super into environmental issues and I actually was a big fan of DEI so I am implementing them back again". For him it is just hedging bets.

I got an idea, lets empty venice temporarily and turn this all into battle royale. Lets see how many seconds does it take Jeff to sell Lauren out for a gun.

I wonder how many jet flights do a single year of collective paper straw using offsets

I mean 999million is already too much but it is a great start. We can give some more fake benefits that soothe the narcissistic ego of these people like promise that their brain and dna will be frozen and then cloned in a future date when the tech is ready. Maybe that way they believe that they can live forever or some shit.

people like him think that raising children = disseminating your genetic material. for him the kids are already lucky enough to get their prime genetic material.

he is probably completely invested in the idea that his genetic material is the real shit and is trying to make sure he disseminates it successfully. You gotta love these people who think that everyone else in the world is a NPC.

I think we have all seen what Israeli propaganda outlets look like. People get fired and labelled anti-semitist at the slightest mention of war crimes by Israel let alone mentioning the genocide. An Israeli propaganda outlet does not publish articles that help form a public consensus that what Israel is doing is genocide. I agree such news definitely cost Guardian its reputation but I disagree that Guardian is a full on Israel propaganda outlet. In fact claiming this after seeing all those articles about genocide and zionism (all of which by the way can be reached by just a one click on the Israel-Palestine link at the main page) is absurd in my opinion.

that is ok, none of these require cold turkey approaches. you start by protesting Jeff's wedding, you continue by replacing some of your amazon shopping with alternatives, next you know you are only using amazon a couple times a year at most. This would already be enough I think as amazon relies on a much higher level of consumerism.