4 points ·
But they might be able to make a similarly powered device with older style ram, it would take a significant re-work though, one that would delay release.
So this basically confirms they didn't go that route.
Joined
4 points ·
But they might be able to make a similarly powered device with older style ram, it would take a significant re-work though, one that would delay release.
So this basically confirms they didn't go that route.
3 points ·
Steam Frame is optionally just a Steam Deck with 'up to' a 4k screen that you don't have to look down at or hold up to your face. It can also be used for VR stuff, but otherwise it's just a better Steam Deck.
It's how I use my Quest 3 already 75% of the time, so it'll be nice to have a headset that had that use case in mind during It's design. And also one where I don't have to give meta money anymore.
2 points ·
Yeah, that is actually one of the other points people sometimes use to refute the atom bombs being a war crime. That they didn't kill as many civilians as firebombs or carpet bombing... I know you aren't, just brought it to mind. But yeah, that only makes those other types of bombs also war crimes. Hehe.
13 points ·
Does he not know that using the atom bombs to kill civilians was kind of considered a bit of a no-no?
The justification that "it ended the war early, actually 'saving' lives" is moot, killing civilians to save soldiers, is pretty much strongly considered the opposite of the point. It is a war crime.
Not having been charged with it, isn't something you want to go poking at. Everyone has kind of loosely agreed to leave it in the past. But that doesn't have to stay the case if you make people upset enough like that.
14 points ·
Ukraine themselves reports it at 105ktons of munitions destroyed. And honestly, I trust their remote intel better than russias direct intel on how much it was. Hehe.
7 points ·
If your post said what you wanted it to say, without missing a sentance explaining the part you kept in your head, people wouldn't have to "figure out" that you are saying the opposite of what it sounds like you are saying, because "you know" you would never say what it looks like you are saying.
You just need a second sentence about how it's hypocracy that they said that or something. The part that you know in your head, but didn't put "on paper".
It's like, in speaking, you could just emphasise the right syllables the right way and that string of text would read exactly how you intend it to. But in text, that doesn't work.
It's like putting down the lyrics to a song without the melody and expecting everyone to sing it the same way you hear it in your head. Only works if they already know the melody. There is no way for us to know your melody, so you instead can't write ambiguously. If you want other people to follow along.
11 points ·
Half your thought is still in your head. When you read this to yourself, it sounds like what you intended to say. When everyone else reads it, we are still missing context.
30 points ·
You are not good at your job.
5 points ·
VR desktop streamers, do the same thing but optionally in multimonitor 4k and don't have to look at our hands the whole time. Also can play on a recliner comfortably. My neck is in so much better shape since I started using my VR headset to stream instead of a phone or other handheld. Plus the screens are 20 feet away, nice on the eyes. And still take up 80 degrees of my field of view. Not sure what effective size that makes them, but it's bigger and nicer looking than a theatre screen.