1 points ·
Are you actually willing to talk without resorting to insults, misapplying formal debate jargon you don't understand, or misrepresenting what was previously said?
Joined
1 points ·
Are you actually willing to talk without resorting to insults, misapplying formal debate jargon you don't understand, or misrepresenting what was previously said?
1 points ·
Apparently you are
1 points ·
Damn, now you're gone from copy pasting retorts you didn't understand from Wikipedia from copy pasting retorts you didn't understand from me
1 points ·
You would participate in a good faith conversation because you have intelligent opinions
Why? When you're just going to respond with copy pasting reddit debate incantations, lying, and talking like an anime villain. Which is exactly what you continue to do.
or just keep hissing and spitting, whatever.
That's you, boo.
1 points ·
I’m here but you haven’t made any good faith effort to contribute to the conversation for several comments.
Why would I try to converse in good faith with someone who responds by randomly copy pasting Latin from Wikipedia because reddit taught them that's what debate is, while consistently talking in the most smug, condescending and disingenuous tone imaginable?
1 points ·
I see you discovered more magic invocations to parrot.
1 points ·
What's the matter, run out of Wikipedia incantations?
1 points ·
Still going down your list of magic debate spells, wandering why none of them are working
1 points ·
Was there ever a time you didn't talk like the cringeist nerd on Reddit?
-1 points ·
Their original comment absolutely did not imply they thought that it was only MAGAheads
Yes it absolutely did. Stop being deliberately obtuse.
1 points ·
>u mad bro!
Wow, I didn't realize it was 2012 again
1 points ·
So you can't point to where I said it explicitly.
Hypocrite
1 points ·
Oh look, you've suddenly flipped back to demanding explicit quotes, when previously you accepted implications.
Hypocrite.
2 points ·
>You comment strongly implied
Oooooh, so *now* you're willing to accept implied statements!
What happened to demanding *explicit* quotes only? Which implicit is exactly the opposite of.
And yes, there is the same strong implication in their comment
1 points ·
Man, you really can't stop yourself from talking like the biggest reddit smuglord loser alive
1 points ·
>triggers
Stopped reading here
5 points ·
Basically a straight up admition that they're both meaningless though terminating cliches
1 points ·
Oh no, it's caught in a loop
5 points ·
I see you're now just going down the list of magic incantations you learned from Wikipedia.
Not to mention, doubling down on talking like the biggest reddit loser imaginable. How about you tell us about bacon and narwals next
2 points ·
So you can't then