u/Allero

Most of your points can be readily disproved with a single search query, however, it's not worth engaging with a person who can't hold their temper for a second.

Therapy does magic.

In no way to be a snob, but could we tone it down? After all, we're mostly on the same page on that the state of Israel is committing war crimes, we only differ in who we blame for it.

Back to the substance:

First, Israel as an independent state exists since 1948, so yes, the absolute majority of people living in modern day Israel were born there; they are not the same people who came to displace Palestinians all those decades ago.

Second, I did not talk about IDF soldiers. Those who voluntarily joined Israeli armed forces do take part in an act of evil, and deserve to be judged. I do not support the same notion in respect to Israeli civilians and those on mandatory service.

Third, in your robber hypothetical, where are the Israeli civilians? Do they have to renounce their citizenship and go live abroad not to receive "stolen goods"? Someone who is opposed to the war taking place are not "robbers" here.

How are you engaging in genocide if you do not take part in the war? And especially if you denounce the actions of your government? Is being born in Israel enough to be seen as a genocidal maniac?

I swear this "settler" discourse is gonna drive me crazy at some point.

Yay for that!

Hope as many generals as possible got into the fire

Zionists are mostly Jews, but Jews are mostly not Zionists.

But yes, according to Talmud, Israel shouldn't exist.

As long as they are not on active duty, they shouldn't be targets. And if they are forced to serve, they should still only be killed if they are an active threat. Normally, they should first be offered to surrender.

Hope you're acting ironic and do not actually call to genocide all Jews in Israel.

Let's see military objects used against Gaza and Iran getting destroyed. Do not raze countries to the ground.

So, she just chose one of two most cruel conflicts. Arguably, Palestinians face an even worse fate, with an extensive humanitarian crisis, than even the Ukrainians.

Why do you specifically choose Ukraine over Palestine?

Plenty of countries got into crosshairs due to the new wave of international propaganda.

Unfortunately, there aren't that many ways to combat it under truly free speech, so many have chosen to outright ban various sources linked tto potentially malicious actors.

But once that is done, the gates are open. Now that plenty of governments have the power to ban whoever they deem bad, the freedom of press and democracy are under threat.

Let's not get astray here.

The reason El Salvador stopped using Bitcoin as a legal tender is not because it's some sort of failed experiment (it had issues, but still), but due to continuous pressure of IMF interested in maintaining a US dollar-centric economy.

El Salvador is reliant on US dollars in its economy, which puts it under heavy US influence. Knowing Salvadoran currency wouldn't be strong, Nayib Bukele suggested an alternative option - risky, volatile, but free from pressure of other countries and strongly appreciating in the long run. IMF didn't like it, and that's where we are.

So, when you cheer Bitcoin not being legal tender anymore, you also cheer US and IMF projecting power over the country.

No one needs to be wiped out. What's currently happening is taxing on the side of Israel and is absolutely devastating for the civilian Palestinians.

Peace talks, two-state solution and resignation of Netanyahu are the only ways.