*Permanently Deleted*
c/world · u/Mee@reddthat.com · 63 points
Comments
u/StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world · 8 points
>LOL, statutory rape is okay when the predator is hot LOLOL
Do feel free to fuck off.
u/gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 1 points
[deleted]
u/NABDad@lemmy.world · 8 points
She decided he wasn't mature enough to raise a child.
u/Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca · 8 points
But it gets the information into the comments so others like myself don't need to read the article.
u/lurch@sh.itjust.works · 4 points
but then you would have wasted your time, plus everyone else who got confused like you
u/Phineaz@feddit.org · 6 points
Oh, that makes much more sense now. Thanks, I Could also have just read the article instead of wasting your time :D
u/schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de · 26 points
she (the minister for children) was 22, the other person was 15, i.e. a teenager
u/AmidFuror@fedia.io · 2 points
Her relationship made history.
u/njm1314@lemmy.world · 48 points
That is a very awkwardly worded title
u/electric@lemmy.world · 27 points
What's real heinous and not mentioned in the blurb is that the father wanted to be involved with raising his son but she cut off contact a year after the birth and still forced him to pay child support. What a *removed*.
u/Phineaz@feddit.org · 9 points
So was she a teenager or 22 back then? Confusing ...
u/lumony@lemmings.world · -10 points
She looks pretty gross, but maybe she was hot 30 years ago?