Instead of F-35, Portugal turns to Europe in search of new fighter

It might unravel America, which would have much longer lasting consequences.

Donald Trump is not suicidal!

Don't think that will happen with the Tempest program being the main focus for the raf but if they could make a carrier capable tranche version it could be a good stopgap.

Euro fighter with vectoring engines, and better stealth would be doooope

Most dictators do, unfortunately. It takes several attempts and many courageous people willing to sacrifice to get there and sometimes that doesn't even stop the dictatorship, as the dictator has a successor lined up.

plus donald has Musk as a lightning rod and a human shield.

The Intel here is primarily the specs and settings of enemy EW, radar, and weapons. The second they turn any of that on within detection range you have the intelligence on it. That's why Turkey got dropped from the F-35 deal way back. They had Russian air defense systems and D.C. didn't want them combining the two to give Russia a profile of the F-35 from their own systems.

I don't think it's as simple as "upgrade it myself." They need data to know how to upgrade it. That takes massive Sigint capabilities, etc. Other countries don't have the capability.

Of course, with our intelligence allies withholding intelligence today and cooperating with each other, the playing field is much more level, so maybe.

State level actors are capable of providing those updates themselves... That update is the mythical off switch they talked about and it's absolutely sensational bunk.

Even if they don't have an "off switch" they can just not update the software. Those jets require constant updates and without it the radars don't work right and the stealth degrades.

America has shown it wants Donald or a Donald substitute.

well they also voted for kennedy, and they still killed him, assuming that's how that works.

Other countries changing military suppliers isn’t going to change back to america for 10-15 years (hell, maybe even longer, I dunno what the service life of a jet platform is).

Other countries changing military suppliers isn’t going to change back to america for 10-15 years (hell, maybe even longer, I dunno what the service life of a jet platform is).

the service life of the f16 has been like forever, i think it's been close to like 70 years now? Hell of a modernization in between then and now, similar story with the f22, although it's quite a bit newer. Military equipment doesn't really have a service life, it's more so an effectiveness constant.

That's all true, but Vance is a coward who will care more about his life than about what America wants.

Killing Donny wouldn't change much, tho.

America has shown it wants Donald or a Donald substitute.

Project 2025 is now Americas playbook.

Other countries changing military suppliers isn't going to change back to america for 10-15 years (hell, maybe even longer, I dunno what the service life of a jet platform is).

The risk that has surfaced of "America has an off switch" - even just the potential risk of rumors of an off switch - means all those military assets are useless when America elects unhinged leaders that are willing to subvert democratic process in order to run their playbook.

And America has shown it is willing to do that. Even prefers to do that

The Donald has Hitler levels of luck in that regard.

if you're of Russian descent, i can understand the concept of just, forgetting about certain problems, they were notorious for that one.

But i can assure you, the F35 has the ability to make up for those downfalls, it's like you said, a trade off. You trade stealth and maneuverability for additional hardware and functionality, it's a fighter positioned for a different role in modern warfare, it's not meant to solely defend itself, it's meant to be a functional piece of a military force.

The F22 can take on multiple F35s at the same time and smoke 'em.

The F22 is also an incredibly capable fighter jet, even more so than the extremely capable f15/f16 that's been around for damn near ever. In fact, the F22 and F35 are probably supposed to work together, rather than separately. The F35 covers roles the F22 cannot, the F22 covers roles the F35 cannot, it's the basis of most military strategy.

I'm guessing the F22 is beating the F35 specifically in dog fighting, a task it's literally not meant for. Given that it's also a recent addition to the fleet, it's not uncommon for the military to put new tech in all kinds of weird situations to battle test it, ensure that it can do what it should, and to (this is really important) understand it's weaknesses in the event that it becomes relevant.

Interestingly enough, the fact that the F35 carries weapons at all is pretty impressive, given it's technical feats.

In those same tests when they let the F-35 engage at range it won most of the time. It's literally the close in dogfight part that it doesn't win at and that's why the F-22 is supposed to do that for it. The F-35 without an F-22 mission profile is to sneak into radar range, trigger AIM 174s from the super hornets behind it to clear enemy air assets and then get into range for it's air to ground payload; drop that and light the afterburner to go home. At no point is it envisioned willingly dogfighting.

You're telling me the purpose built air superiority fighter can out fight the multi-role strike-fighter? That's wild and who'd of thunk!

I never understood why they stopped making the F22. Less profit, probably.

F35 is designed to be a multirole fighter-bomber, it's a jack of all trades, but has some serious tradeoffs in stealth and maneuverability. And before you go off (rightfully) about how dogfighting is mostly irrelevant in the modern age, manuverability is also how you crank to avoid missiles at long range.

The F22 can take on multiple F35s at the same time and smoke 'em.

that was also the logic that lead to russia thinking they could beat ukraine, uh, didn't work.

Valid

It is american?

This about sums it up.

it's trash, if you ignore literally everything it's good at, which is basically everything it's designed for.

Turns out cars aren't very good at crossing the ocean. Who would've thunk a fighter jet not designed for dogfighting wouldn't be designed to dogfight. Truly a baffling conundrum.

By all metrics available, the F35 is literally the most capable jet in existence, it's technological capabilities are literally unmatched.

What makes you form that opinion?

The F35 is trash anyways

That's how we get shitty aircraft. Need to speed up developing homebrew avionics for the F35s.

What leftist politicians have been murdered?

So me advocating for the closure of US military installations in other countries makes me a colonialist? I do not think you know what that word means.

You think Asia will want to ally with you? Lol.

The only country which would do that is Russia.

The hornet nest is already kicked up... And the US is 60% of NATO right NOW. Which means Europe needs to bolster themselves. And its easier to do that without handing over half a billion bucks for nothing.

Just ignore it. Trump ignores contracts all the time. At worst? He'd just put more tariffs on the EU, because he knows not a single general will launch a war in Europe.

Sure.

The USA is like 60% of NATO forces.

So this would more likely lead to the dissolution of NATO.

The point I was making is that the adults in the room would probably prefer to not kick the hornets nest despite preparing for the worst if the hornets nest kicks off.

Yeah, I think it's best to treat the US these days like a dangerous dog you meet in an alley - don't make eye contact and back slowly away.

So, the US attacks a NATO member, kicking off Article 5.

Use stolen military technology as a casus-belli maybe?

presumably NATO could group up, and vote to kick a country out of NATO, i assume this would be one of those cases, if they really caused trouble.

Well, an easier fix is to just keep using the engine design, and stop paying the license fees.

What is the US gonna do? Stop supporting NATO? Put tariffs on exports to the EU? Stop being an ally, and ally themselves with Russia?

The Eurofighter's prettier, estranged cousin

And then there's the rafale

Uses a license produced engine from US (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_RM12), which has caused endless problems in exports for SAAB, since the US blocks them frequently when they are about to win a contract.

I would go for Rafale or Eurofighter and I am saying this as a swede. We need to replace the engines ASAP. Perhaps a UK, German or French one. Would probably take years to develop thought and likely a significant overhaul will be necessary.

What about the Eurofighter?

Uses US engine

Mate I dislike JS as much as anyone but there's no need to bring it in here.

I'd also happily argue against ground-based assets, they don't need tanks either! They need tools for enforcing their naval sovereignty and fighting pirates and such, but fighter jets aren't really the best tools for those jobs.

Also, I acknowledged that fulfilling obligations is necessary. They don't need *new fighter jets* for that. Besides, if we reach the point where Russia invades NATO it's just going to rapidly escalate to nukes and then we'll all die anyway so 🤷‍♀️

This is just Portugal giving away their own people's money to businesses in other countries.

Russia has bases in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, Russian ships and submarines have passed along the Portuguese coast, only leaving with the intervention of our navy and even before this war, it was customary for Russian jets to violate the airspace of a random European country at least once a month, only leaving under the escort of the air forces to test their response time. We are not that protected from Russia as the geographical distance might erroneously lead us to believe.

In short, jets are needed for at least surveillance, deterrence and joint missions with our allies.

P.S.: I hope it doesn't happen, but Trump has already threatened to violate the territorial integrity of Canada and Denmark. Who can guarantee that he won't do the same to Portugal? The Azores archipelago, halfway between the US and Europe, is quite important strategically. He might consider claiming our islands.

I'm sorry but you're just talking of your ass there.

Portuguese Air-force assets, including fighter jets, are constantly deployed to the Portuguese Economic Area for missions such following the naval assets of hostile nations passing through or near it or even investigating possible criminal activity. The maritime EEA of Portugal is way larger than the actual country and at times the only vehicles that can reach further out enough fast enough are fighter jets.

Furter, fighter jets are literally the only kind of significant help Portugal would be able to send within to its Eastern European partners in the EU and NATO if Russia invaded them (certainly neither the Leopard tanks or regular infantry would get there for a while).

By pointing out that the land territory of Portugal is at low risk of invasion you're actually making the point in favor of fighter jets since those assets make a lot more sense than ground-based assets for a country whose main military demands are on a huge sea area off its territority including far-away parts (around Madeira and Azores) and its military obligations in the two large military alliances the country is part of.

Okay, but actually attacking them on the far western tip of the continent would require going past the rest of the EU/NATO bloc. That's just not realistic. The most they might ever deal with is piracy, and they don't need jets for that.

Fulfilling obligations is obviously necessary, but they don't need new jets. This is obviously just military Keynesianism.

You claimed that Portugal not having been involved in major wars for almost a century (which was a false claim) was a reason for the country to not need jets, an argument which literally links the need for jets to being involved in major wars.

Now you've moved the goalposts and it's only "some" major wars that justify having jets, not "other" major wars, and which are the "jet requiring wars and which aren't" being entirelly up to you to define.

(FYI, Portugal used fighter jets in its Colonial Wars)

In summary, you've literally talked yourself into a "it's so because i say it's so argumentative corner".

The feeling that your discourse in all your posts here leaves is that you do not want Portugal to have jets, for reasons that have nothing at all to do with the geostrategical and defense needs and objectives of Portugal and is in fact related to the imperialistic objectives of certain, completelly different and non-friendly, countries being better served by a less well armed Europe, only you can't just outright come out and say it because that would severely damage the "opinion making" ability of your comments, hence the half-arsed circular argumentation balanced on top of nothing more than misinformation and unfundamented opinion.

Hey, maybe I'm wrong, so I'll leave it to others in this thread to make up their own minds about it.

Ah shit, I said "continental" in a different comment. I mispoke here, you're right.

I still don't see how the colonial wars are an argument for Portugal having jets. Those wars were unjustified and Portugal deserved to lose every single one.

First

Portugal hasn’t seen conflict for almost a hundred years.

then

> I said “continental” for a reason

So you're simply lying.

I'll absolutelly talk down to people outright lying about things I know better because I was born in the bloody place, members of my family were involved in it and I grew up hearing about it: shameless liars coming here to parrot propaganda do not deserve respect.

I said "continental" for a reason, don't talk down to me. I'm also pretty sure Portugal didn't face any danger at all during those wars. In fact, those wars are actually an argument for not allowing Portugal to have jets!

In your ignorance you're forgetting the "Colonial Wars" until 74 that were bad enough that directly caused the fall of the Fascist Regime in Portugal.

Ukraine was surrounded by conflcits long before it was invaded. Portugal hasn't seen conflict for almost a hundred years.

They are not comparable.

A puppet is as strong as the hand controlling it.

They need an air force to stop me?

Damn I didn't realize I was so powerful!

Nukes, long-range cruise missiles, drones, guerrila training, electronic warfare and the main vehicles to deploy many of those things: planes.

As demonstrated again and again (for example in Vietname and Afghanistan), wars against the US aren't won by crushing the US military, they're won by making it too costly for America in lives and equipment - a nuked carrier group or the caskets of hundreds or thousands of american military personnel thrown again and again into conquering a piece of land that gets lost again to guerrilla tactics within a month or trying to hold a meaningless piece of territory is how American invasions get turned around.

And you need planes, to deliver those nukes...

Point. However, the only realistic defense from the US empire is to rely on the nuclear arms from their allies or build their own nukes. Nothing else really matters.

Continental Western Europe hasn’t seen conflict for almost a hundred years.

So, WWII, that last major war... Taught a lesson: You need to be able to use violence, to deal with fascists. Because, before you know it, they're walking across all of Europe.

Now, Portugal needs to worry about the hostile force that can park a fleet of warships off their coast (The US).

From you, and from anyone who says we don't need defenses.

The comparison doesn't really make sense, Eastern Europe has seen conflict since the 90s: the Yugoslav Wars, the Transnistria conflict, the Georgian–Ossetian conflict, the Chechen-Russian conflict, etc. etc.

Continental Western Europe hasn't seen conflict for almost a hundred years. The closest conflict was the Troubles in the British Isles.

Who does Portugal need to defend themselves from?

When the shit goes down tho

They could also *not* have a fleet of jets and they'd be fine.

Of course. But they don't have to go full MIC and could still keep a small fleet of jets that will be good for a few decades but at some point they've gotta modernize.

We already have good social programs, but honestly they have been declining in quality over the last decade and a half. We still are much better than countries like America in this aspect. We have a number of defense companies, including a drone company, that could grow significantly with the expected European defense investments, which will generate jobs and more tax revenue to, if we are smart, improve our social welfare system.

Okay, but every People have a right to demand their government spend money on social programs and not military boondoggles. Ultimately, what do the Portuguese want? Do they want more jets?

Portugal could never buy enough jets to stop the US

No, but Spain is right next to it and France isn't that far. Both likely to help. But why would they help Portugal if Portugal itself doesn't take meaningful steps to protect itself? You use a lot of exclamation points in your comments! That doesn't magically mean you're right.

So, in solidarity, with the rest of Europe, all arms equally, to defend.

United we stand, divided we fall.

Portugal could never buy enough jets to stop the US. They need nukes. Not a ton! Just a few is enough to scare away other powers.

As for Russia, they're literally the farthest country in Europe from them! Getting to Portugal would mean Europe has collapsed and can't stop Russia, and once again, the only defense here would be nukes.

Give it time, and the US will. Or Russia. The two worst offenders in the "Colonial and imperialist empires". Both of which are hard up on the sabre rattling at this time.

Doesn't matter. Every sovereign country has the right to enforce their rules in their airspace (in accordance with international law) at the very least

To stay sovereign *from who?* Who's coming for Portugal?

Why the hell does a sovereign country need an air force ? Really ? (Hint : to stay sovereign, for starter)

"Why the hell does Ukraine need nukes?"

*You in 1994, presumably.*

Portugal has a massive maritime Exclusive Economic Area for the size of the country both because it mainly stands alone at the westermost tip of Europe (bar a small piece of Spain to the north of Portugal and then, way further North and more to the East, the Republic Of Ireland), and because of the Azores archipelago (which adds a massive circle in the middle of the Atlantic to Portugal's maritime EEA) and the Madeira archipelago (which adds a semi-circle off the West coast of Africa).

Further, Portugal is expected to militarily cooperate with the rest of the EU in case of an attack on any EU country (the most likely of which would be Russia attacking an Eastern European member) and ditto for NATO, which is especially important for exactly fighter planes because they're the most mobile military assets around.

It makes sense for the Portuguese Military to focus more on the Air Force, Navy, the local equivalent of Marines (Fuzileiros) and air-transported commandos and less on Armor, Artillery and Regular Infantry exactly because it's land territory is far less likely to be directly invaded but it both has a massive sea "territory" and it belongs to very large military alliances or alliances with military treaty obligations containing far away members which have a real risk of being invaded.

Well, the best time to build up a military defensive force is in times of peace, so it's there in times of invasion.

See: Ukraine.

Or, just ignore it, pay 0, and see if the US has the stones to try and do anything about it.

Spoiler, we dont.

Even business-wise and strictily obbeying the contract conditions, paying 500 million for nothing still makes more business sense that paying billions for what will become inactive-plane-shaped pieces of metal if Canada ever needs to defend itself against the only country that geographically is in a position of actually invading it.

Money well spent. But, frankly, who is that 500 million to? What happens if... They just don't pay? I mean, Trump is very familiar with just not paying bills owed, maybe Canada should just... Return in kind?

There has been talk. Apparently will cost about 500 million to cancel the contract.

You also gotta make sure nobody tries to steal the Azores for their beautiful nature.

Which in turn will probably also help with economies of scale, making the ex-subsidy cost of that equipment go down.

Uhh, don't expect any special insights here

It looks to me like it's pretty impressive considering that it's the second combat plane ever built in the country, and the experience gained from that is a valuable thing.

I have to _assume_ that it's less capable and less expensive than the four that I mentioned, based on how it has fared as an export. It seems to have struggled against the European, American, and Chinese offerings, or in many cases have been considered as a trainer by countries that are already flying one of those previously-mentioned ones. Obviously there's a lot of politics involved in these purchases, but if Australia has already bought F-35s and wants Tejases as trainers then it suggests that Australia has a good reason to think that Tejas is a lot less expensive and also less effective at actually fighting a war

It seems like it suits its role well, though - a cost-effective solution for India's needs, and a way to develop domestic expertise

A last point to consider is that the rafale is cheaper to operate than the F-35

That's all well and good, but you're also missing a critical point.

The European Union is very likely to introduce a bill that will massively subsidize purchases of local (EU) military equipment. This will make all EU alternatives much, much more attractive than F-35s.

This is a great move by the EU - it drives a lot of military spending away from the US and into the local economies, while shoring up its own security as well as preventing being at the hands of a fickle fascist for maintenance and upgrades.

For once, our (Croatian) government lucked into making a good choice when they went with Rafales instead of F-16Vs.

What's your opinion on Tejas (Yes, I know it's not European)

Thank you. This was the answer I was looking for.

Disclaimer in that I am not in any way an expert on military procurement: it depends on what they buy.

There are three European planes that can do similar roles: the Typhoon (Anglo-German-Italian), the Rafale (French), and the Gripen (Swedish). According to this RUSI article, it looks like the Typhoon is probably actually _more_ expensive per plane. The Typhoon was also, unlike the other two and the F-35, designed to be a pure air superiority fighter, so it's more of an F-22 competitor than an F-35 one. Probably not what Portugal is looking for. That RUSI article has the Rafale as being a bit more expensive than the F-35 and the Gripen being a bit cheaper than it. _However_, the source for the F-35's number is the flyaway cost for the Americans, who did ordered it in huge numbers and also did most (not all, but most) of the development and I would assume get a better deal than others. Further, it's in an article headlined "F-35’s price might rise, Lockheed warns". So I'm just going to hedge my bets and say:

• If they buy the Typhoon, definitely no, but the Typhoon probably isn't the right fit anyway

• If they buy the Rafale, somewhere around the same, and it'll still be extremely capable

• If they buy the Gripen, yes, and it'll still be very good but not quite individually capable as the other options

The enemy of my enemy

They do something for military, so it’s not a docile, purely civilian company

:D

What about the expertise in suiciding whistleblowers?

Doesn't Boeing do mostly civilian aircraft?


Edit: on the upside, it’ll probably come with a zero/zero ejection seat as a standard feature, so that’s neat.

The funniest possible outcome of this would be Lockheed Martin starting up a Tesla competitor

What about the expertise in suiciding whistleblowers?

They’re not more likely to have clout or death squads (of their own, at least) than other major industries of comparable size and importance, and everything is structured in such a compartmentalized way that they couldn’t really leverage that against the government if they actually wanted to throw down.

now if they have influence over the military... That's what starts coups.

I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

Honestly, I feel it's more likely to display how much the defense industry is just another ordinary industry. They'll whinge and wring their hands, maybe openly support the limpdick opposition if they're feeling particularly pressured, but all that experience in making killing machines is just engineering and marketing. They're not more likely to have clout or death squads (of their own, at least) than other major industries of comparable size and importance, and everything is structured in such a compartmentalized way that they couldn't really leverage that against the government if they **actually** wanted to throw down.

The defense industry is more like the oil industry than a cyberpunk future. Influential, not independent.

>Fucking with a defense contractor's

Good point. Hadn't really thought of it that way. What an enormous mess..

I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor's bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

_#ElbowsUp_ eh

>that's $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn't get

And that's just the beginning.

Portugal would probably have bought more, since we have a large area of the Atlantic Ocean that needs to be patrolled not only by sea, but also by air.

Do they get more planes for their buck now?

NATO destroyed asia? Aside from vietnam, which im not sure is in asia off the top of my head, which was also a war the US was personally involved in, im not sure what influence NATO has had outside of NATO member states. You know, the ones that actually matter.

Now I understand why the phrase may you live in interesting times isn’t exactly a kind remark.

it's an interesting time to be alive in, that's for sure.

WWIII ofc, it's inevitable if NATO falls. Who knows how it will play out, but it will play out if that comes to pass.

You mean how NATO destroyed Asia, Africa and the Middle East and is making masses of refugee streams emigrate? Very stable indeed.

NATO is the worlds largest terror organisation by a long shot. You deny their crimes committed in broad daylight because you have not been a victim of them.

What is next, The Empire did nothing wrong?

because that's the entire crux of NATO, the post war world, and most of the military stability that currently exists throughout the western world, and beyond.

Who knows what happens after this point.

Why is that a bad thing ?

I'm assuming because American arms dealers like Lockheed Martin are losing a ton of business and America is rapidly losing the soft power and influence its build over the past 80 years


Noggles


Yeah. We know. Others are going ro find out.

Why is that a bad thing ?

US MIC: "I wish the Feds would buy more guns and less butter."

\*monkey paw curls*

For them it is easier, because as I understand they didn't sign any contract yet, just were planning to.

hey guys, I think that trump guy might just be really awful for America.

Love to see it

If we assume that Portugal would have ordered the same number as Czechia (a fellow European country with a pretty close GDP, population, and military budget that already bought F-35s) and take the flyaway cost on wikipedia of $82.500,000 as the price Portugal would have paid per plane, that's $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn't get

It's migration season, and this is only the first bird - I predict there's more of them.

I think we have an interesting conflict of interest on the US side of the ocean: "the US military industrial complex" vs. "Trump, driving away their customers".

They went to the fighter store and all the F-35s were turned upside down.

Why would anybody feel they can rely on American hardware anymore? Any country with any sense won’t be beholden to them as an ally now thanks to that idiotic mango.

Portugal was lucky to get quite late aboard the F35 ship, as they decided about it as late as April 2024.

Finland, where I'm from, was one of the earliest ones, deciding about the procurement in late 2022. Some other ones, as told by Wikipedia:

Canada: Jan 2023

Czechia: Jan 2024

Germany: 2023

Greece: Delivery 2027, so ordered probably in late 2023 or so?

Poland: 2020, apparently some already delivered?

Romania: November 2024

Singapore: Early 2024

Switzerland: delivery from 2027, so probably ordered in late 2023?

The further the procurement process, the more money might get wasted if the order has to be cancelled. Would still make sense to cancel, though, because a weapon you are free to use as long as there is no war is just a heap of scrap metal. It does not matter how much money we've already spent on the scrap metal, we should not put a cent more.

Yeah I got a sneaking suspicion that LMC’s gonna see a ton of options getting dropped and orders cancelled. Our government is not to be trusted. We’ll use that shit as leverage at some point.

Let’s do this too! 🇨🇦

Got to speed up the European 6th gen fighter development

Yea, imagine getting a brand-new fleet of F-35s and then king trump wakes up and has them bricked to blitz-annex the Azores.

Dunno if you'll find a more European fighter than the Gripen.

Good for them. It's clear that we (the U.S.) can no longer be trusted to act in good faith.

As they should. I'll tell you that as an American you shouldn't trust the US government.

O mundo já mudou. Houve eleições nos EUA, houve uma posição em relação à NATO e ao mundo, afirmada pelo secretário para a Defesa e pelo próprio Presidente dos EUA, que tem que ser tida em conta também na Europa e no que tem a ver com Portugal.

E esse nosso aliado, que ao longo de décadas foi sempre previsível, poderá trazer limitações na utilização, na manutenção, nos componentes, em tudo aquilo que tem a ver com a garantia de que as aeronaves serão operacionais e serão utilizadas em todo o tipo de cenários.

Interview here, in Portuguese.

*The world has already changed. There were elections in the USA, there was a position [change] regarding NATO and the world, stated by both the Defense Secretary and the President of the USA, that has to be taken into account in Europe and in Portugal.*

*Our ally, who through decades has always been predictable [as in steadfast], may bring limitations to using, to maintaining, to components, anything that relates to the assurance that the planes are operational and can be used in all types of scenarios.*

For some context, Portugal has an aging fleet of F-16s. The national Air Force wants to replace these with F-35s, but that is no longer likely to happen.

He was asked if Portugal would instead purchase, for example, French aircraft, but he declined to answer.

Have to be honest I'm not keen on the UK buying any more either I'd rather see Rafales on the new carriers or a tweaked eurofighter.

Asking stupid question... Isn't this kinda shit that got Kennedy killed? Fucking w the military industrial complex? Have those barons diversified enough to not care about this line of business or something? I thought this was kind of a backbone of our economy. So many jobs too.

Thank fucking god

Stuff like this might actually be what unravels the Trump administration. The military industrial complex is far more powerful than any of the people Orange Julius has surrounded himself with, and they will not like taking losses to appease his ego.

Bravo to Portugal!!! Setting a solid example of what the rest of 1st Class Europe should do with US weapon contracts. The current US political situation is playing a dangerous game with the US MIC.

PORTUGAL CARALHO

Very smart move.

When Finland chose their new 64 F-35s. I supported it. Not anymore. We should have chosen our west neighbour’s Saabs.

well you've got like, two options.

One of them is the swedes, and uh, it's not bad, the other is uh *checks notes* hm, well you've got the swedes at least.

Edit: not the swiss, i confuse the two, they're both european, don't @ me.

It will be good for the USA to not be responsible for 70% of the NATO defense budget. We can close many military bases throughout Europe and pivot to Asia and form new alliances.

Why the hell does Portugal need an air force? Is Russia going to cross the entire continent to attack them? Is Morocco going to launch an invasion through the straight of Gibraltar?

Cool use of money.