Steam Frame: The Ars Technica review
c/steamdeck · u/Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz · 106 points
c/steamdeck · u/Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz · 106 points
u/DireTech@sh.itjust.works · 11 points
This will make an awesome travel computer. Still capable of playing games, but also a giant screen for movies or even desktop work.
A lot of hotels make hooking up the steam deck to the tv a pain so this way I won’t have to deal with it anymore.
u/zewm@lemmy.world · 7 points
My desire is inhibited by my platform. It won’t have Linux support day 1, so just gotta deal with *not* using a desktop PC for the power it could provide.
u/yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 4 points
>the desire to not use a desktop PC

u/Zorque@lemmy.world · 13 points
It's an Albany headset.
u/Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 points
Framed hams?
u/auzy1@lemmy.world · 3 points
Thats fair.. My PC sucks at the moment
u/RaoulDook@lemmy.world · 6 points
I'll play a few games on it directly, which will be convenient, but I also understand that I can't strap a big RTX GPU to my head like the one in my desktop.
They are simply 2 different levels of VR experience. Also I can run Elden Ring in VR on the PC, and a lot of other VR mods.
u/auzy1@lemmy.world · 3 points
If the games ran on the headset directly though, would you still bother with PC VR?
that was the problem with the meta quest. Steam Frame is a proper computer, and you could even use different stores.
u/RaoulDook@lemmy.world · 13 points
PC VR is a major part of the VR market, so it is important. I would never pay a single cent to Meta, so I have only used PC VR.
u/vividspecter@aussie.zone · 3 points
>Even in Windows, I struggled getting streaming working on quest.
Ironically, streaming is better on Linux these days with the full open source stack (wivrn + xrizer) than it is on Windows.
Hopefully, the Frame will at least support wivrn at launch (which should in theory as it's just an android apk on the client side).
u/TheSambassador@lemmy.world · 1 points
Have you tried Steam Link recently (and on at least a 5ghz WiFi connection with decent signal)? It really works well with pretty much zero hassle.
u/massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 29 points
"Your Steam Frame headset easily pairs with your Steam Controller; you’ll even see a virtual Steam Controller floating in your VR space. Stream from your PC, laptop, Steam Deck or Steam Machine for an immersive experience with any of your favorite games."
So I take that as it does stream from Linux,
u/MajinBlayze@lemmy.world · 9 points
I saw elsewhere that the feature is planned for launch but wasn't available to reviewers
u/auzy1@lemmy.world · 3 points
I owned 2 quest headsets. The only time I used streaming was for alyx, and that runs natively here.
Even in Windows, I struggled getting streaming working on quest.
It's not as big a deal for many like me as people think
u/cyrl@lemmy.world · 28 points
Its absolutely nuts if they launch this without the ability to stream from their own, Linux-based, hardware.
The article doesnt explicity state that foveated streaming is nor supported on Linux, but it does go.our of it's way to mention Windows in every instance it mentions streaming.
u/massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 27 points
And you call it Steam Frame despite it clearly being grilled.
u/tiramichu@sh.itjust.works · 19 points
Avoiding Meta’s platform lock-in isn’t worth the hundreds of extra dollars Valve is seeking for its unsubsidized VR hardware
Avoiding Meta is THE EXACT reason it's worth hundreds more.
u/taiyang@lemmy.world · 13 points
I don't understand the desire to *not* use a desktop PC for all the power it provides, but I'm not an everyday normal consumer. For a wireless VR set attached to a computer, it sounds lovely-- I'd like a cheaper, gutted version that's strictly for streaming.
But I suppose for now, I can stick to my Index, especially with prices for parts the way they are. I still much prefer it over Quest 3, tether and all.