u/zaphod

Ja, kenne ich, traditionell wird das so genannt, aber ich bin der Meinung, dass das veraltet und verwirrend ist, ein Pronomen ersetzt ein Nomen, ein Possesivbegleiter fungiert eher als Artikel und ersetzt nichts.

In der modernen Linguistik wird Possessivpronomen auch in einem engeren Sinne verwendet und bezeichnet dann nur Wörter wie seines (in: das ist seines), aber nicht Wörter wie sein (in: sein Haus). Letztere werden dann Possessivartikel (auch: Possessivbegleiter oder Possessivdeterminanten, Possessivdeterminative) genannt.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possessiv

But that's definitely (hopefully?) not going to happen if they pull out of NATO.

Determiners are a more general class of words that include for example articles. Mein is not acting as a pronoun in the example sentence but more like an article.

But the "mein" is there and I wouldn't call it a pronoun in this case. If it's used before a noun like in "mein Geld" then it's just a possessive determiner.

missing pronoun

It's missing the verb and I'm not sure which pronoun you're missing.

TLDR: It's most likely that the parachutes failed to properly deploy.

It's a joke ever since Henry Kissinger got one.

Sugar?

Which countries though?

he hasn’t invaded Iran

Not yet.

He's not a centrist, he's proper right wing.

Competition to cloud services like AWS lambda and such doesn’t exist. That’s what has to be developed and established in the market.

Oh no, no competition to vendor lock-in, how did we manage before that?

What do you mean? You think Amazon has all those AWS data centres in Europe just for themselves? You think Hetzner/OVH/Scaleway/... operate data centres just for the joy of it without having any customers? There are loads of companies in Europe you've never heard about, doing stuff you didn't think was a thing at all.

Sizewell C too. I assume they mean finished plants.

Somehow "ally" in this context makes it sound like Sweden is not part of NATO.

The mentioned far left here is mostly BSW, which are mentally stuck in the DDR. They're like the tankies here on Lemmy.

It was to be expected that the polish government would disappoint to some extent. It's a coalition of four parties that don't agree on everything, so it's to be expected that it's mostly compromises everyone can kind of live with. But wouldn't it make more sense then to vote for a president who most likely won't veto everything, so that the few progressive things the government agrees on can be enacted? If you want progressive politics you vote for progressive parties/people, even if they don't move stuff forward. At least they don't move them backwards, so in the next election you can build on a stronger foundation.

They learned in the last Sejm election, but apparently they already forgot what they learned.

Doubt it, but even if, those aren't the big nukes you need for nuclear deterrence. These you need to strap to a Tornado or F35 and fly it all the way to Moscow or Washington and hope you don't get shot down en route.

Considering this is about the USA becoming unreliable, I would say those nukes don't count.