But they already lost the advantage they had. The point of the retaliatory tariffs are not to make money, but to send a message.
They've already sent a message that they can tolerate Trump's bullshit as long as it doesn't hurt them too much when they backed down on the digital service tax.
Bringing it back now is a lot less effective than implementing it the first time around while still hurting Canadians the same amount.
What is your point in the first place, anyway? That you know better than an active officer just because?
2 points ·
He probably was thinking of the mean instead of the median. Just a typical brain fart.
1 points ·
Which country are you looking at for those statistics?
2 points ·
That's not a source.
2 points ·
Bro, he said a minority in the handheld space. Why would you use the number that included everything that is not handheld?
Competition in the handheld gaming device is good. Why would we want another category where Valve has a monopoly in?
I doubt Microsoft has what it takes to completely overcome Linux's advantages, and the competition will not stifle SteamOS's growth because it is a growing market. Both handheld OS can occupy its own niche that they are good at.
4 points ·
Steam Deck sold about 3.7 million units, while the handheld PCs have sold around 6 million since the Steam Deck was launched. I don't know about you, but that doesn't sound like a minority to me unless you're counting the Switch, as well.
However, neither this Xbox handheld and the Steam Deck will be able to even compare to the volume being sold by Nintendo, so what's the point of even including it in this comparison? We might as well include Android gaming in that comparison, then, which should dwarf everything else by comparison.
3 points ·
They would both have different strengths, so handheld Windows will never snuff out SteamOS when it has a pretty good head start already. Not to mention that any windows handheld will be more expensive than a SteamOS one unless Microsoft is willing to give the license away for free.
1 points ·
It probably won't whoop Linux, but if it can at least get the performance closer, we could have an excitingly competitive handheld OS market.
3 points ·
And yet the student protesters are being run over despite your claim that only armed rioters are burning cops alive. The exact same reasoning Zionists use to justify killing Palestinians. Like I said, you think exactly like a Zionist, which is funny.
6 points ·
So because the US media justifies the killing of Palestinians, China is justified in killing student protesters, is that what you want to say?
Also, you seem to be arguing that since some demonstrators are acting violent, shooting at, running over and oppressing student protesters are also justified? That sounds like the same logic Zionists use to justify killing Palestinians because some of them might be Hamas. You seem to agree with Zionists quite a lot.
1 points ·
The projection is real.
2 points ·
So, if you have poop on your hands, would you eat with that hand after only using toilet paper to wipe it off?
2 points ·
Then, you can do the same with a bidet. After rinsing it with water, use soap, then rinse it again.
4 points ·
Well, I don't, I just use paper towels/tissues. We don't even have towels for hand drying in bathrooms where I'm from.
Why would you want to dry your hand using a towel that is hanging 24/7 in air filled with poop particles in the first place? A bidet being there or not doesn't change that.
1 points ·
You shouldn't be questioning him. He's not the one making the law.
9 points ·
Why are you wiping your wet ass with toilet paper the same way you wipe your poop encrusted ass? Its already clean. Just dab your ass with toilet paper and you won't leave bits of toilet paper in them.
6 points ·
How is leaving your ass crusted in poo less disgusting than wiping your ass after cleaning it with water? Do you not wipe your ass after a shower? If you do, that's just another ass towel that you also use to wipe your whole body. If you don't, that means you don't actually care about having swampy ass in the first place.
1 points ·
Nah, you're just selectively looking at evidence without nuance or understanding of what they actually show, just like people who spout statistics to call black people violent. There's a reason analysis is required to turn data into accurate conclusions, not just looking at it at face value like you are doing. What's funny is you're even using the exact same argument as them when called out.
If you actually understood your own conclusion, you would actually debunk every argument I made for why I don't think your evidence supports your conclusion. Instead, you did this and proven to me the opposite.