tiny lemmy

u/nun

Joined

Posts

Comments

1 points ·

Israel considers the Syrian Golan heights and large chunks of the Palestinian West Bank including Jerusalem as parts of Israel. They effectively occupy and control the entire area of Palestine.

1 points ·

It already includes the West Bank and a chunk of Syria.

15 points ·

Man this is Reddit levels of bait at least make it believable

13 points ·

Yes, Israel obviously is and always has been the aggressor in this conflict. They are also the much more evil side. Doesn’t mean Hamas is incapable of also committing war crimes

-1 points ·

Who cares? And what part of the Israeli government’s actions tells you they care at all whether their hostages live or die?

6 points ·

They’re not dying for nothing. The state of Israel in its current form will not survive this war.

24 points ·

You’re not supposed to feel bad she was an influencer, whatever that means. You’re supposed to feel bad that 11-year-old children are being intentionally targeted by airstrikes.

28 points ·

Not even a little? I recognise that many of their actions are clearly immoral or inhumane but I’m not self righteous enough to know I wouldn’t do the same if everyone I know was murdered, tortured, raped and starved by Israel.

29 points ·

The law of war governs conduct during armed conflict, regardless of whether or not a formal declaration of war exists or how disproportionate said conflict is

3 points ·

Some things require more than just the perceived wishes of a single madman, or the world as we know it would have already been destroyed several times over.

-2 points ·

You think the US is going to attack Canada? Like, with military force? Are you delusional?

5 points ·

Bro how bad did Ashleigh hurt you?

4 points ·

That seems like a reasonable law.

3 points ·

Hey Goosebumps are great

3 points ·

Fair

-8 points ·

This is a dictionary definition. Non-combatant ISIS members are also civilians. Whether they deserve to die or not has no legal bearing. Im unsure why that is considered controversial.

-9 points ·

This is not the legal definition of civilian.

-10 points ·

He is by definition a civilian that was murdered. Legal definitions do not care about our political opinions. It appears to be very likely he was a civilian who _deserved_ to be murdered but that does not change the definition

-5 points ·

? Who said he was innocent

-13 points ·

Clearly everyone here is illiterate lol