u/homoludens

I guess that depends on how you define terrorism. Some definitions require the actors to be individuals or subnational organizations - so the scale of Israel's actions would make it something else. But other than that: yes.

Why do you ask? I haven't seen anyone defending Israel's actions (and the US support of it) in this thread, so I'm not sure how that adds to the discussion.

That does not make Hamas any less of an terrorist organization.

>It’ll just pop up somewhere

That's certainly possible, but it would be a crime.

nobody on the top really believes their own ideology

Source?

>But the perception of being silenced

They are constantly invited to talk shows, news interviews, get frontpages of national magazines etc. and they are still convinced they are silenced.

The article talks about income (the headline seems a bit confusing), the wiki about net worth?

Even if that is "the propaganda" (which I have not seen in this thread btw): your counterproposition is not to dispose of the whole one-dimensional "which atrocity is worse" bullshit, but instead formalizing it by speaking of tiers and arguing that the holocaust wasn't that bad. That's dehumanizing, has no value at all (it's not like a "tier 2 genocide" it somehow more okay) and instead opens the doors for Nazi apologia and antisemtism and derails the discussion.

I don't know how else to say it, but: the unique aspects of the Holocaust are what makes the Holocaust unique.

Making up "tiers" of mass murder or genocide is dehumanizing. There is no point in trying to compare these atrocities - except of course if someone wants to say e.g. "Well, the holocaust wasn't *that* bad".

You need to provide sources. For example: most Germans knew about concentration camps and the mass murder (source).

"Lynching is an extrajudicial killing by a group." Wikipedia (content warning - prominently displayed picture of a lynching victim)

Not buying a ticket ("Erschleichen von Leistungen") is a crime, but it's not a felony ("Verbrechen").