u/TheDemonBuer

Well, the quote I was responding to used the words "open borders" specifically. I may not understand the meaning of the term, as it is being used here, but hopefully you can understand my confusion. I didn't realize that "open borders" meant "you can have and enforce borders." I proceeded on the assumption that those two states exist in opposition to one another.

>If they'll accept Ukrainian law and, you know, not attempt to take over the country, yes why not?

And if the Russians don't accept those terms? Or, say that they accept them to gain entry only to then carry out a campaign of slow annexation?

>During Sunday mass in St Peter’s Square, the pope asked that God ‘open borders, break down walls [and] dispel hatred’

Borders do serve a purpose, though. Should Ukraine open their borders to Russians? There are legitimate reasons for wanting to keep other people out.

>But most of it isn't shit.

Well, I disagree. I think most of it is shit.


God, I hate this country.

You're not getting it. If you like a girl, but there's a part of her that you don't like, you can't just break up with that part of her, you break up with all of her. ALL of her. You get what I'm saying?

You say you love America, but there's this big part of America you hate. So you don't love ALL of America, do you?

But you also ignored the part of my comment where I rightfully pointed out that racism in America is not limited to only the South. Again, if Trump had won only the South, he wouldn't be president. You also ignored the part of my comment where I, again, rightfully pointed out that racism is not America's only problem.

>I love all of it except the South.

Do you say to a significant other I love 2/3 of you? It's an odd compartmentalization, to slice off a large part of something, set that part aside, look at what remains and say I love this thing. I'm talking about America, all of America. The good and the bad, taken together.

You might say that taken together, the good outweighs the bad. In your mind, the bad is contained, concentrated in one specific region, but that's just not true. If you think racism only exists in the South, you're foolish. Did Trump only get votes in the South? If Trump had only won the South, he wouldn't be president right now.

There's also a lot more wrong with this country than racism. That is not our only problem. Even in the areas that might not be as racist, there's plenty of greed, selfishness, an attitude of "I've got mine, screw everyone else."

The South is a big part of this country. You say you love this country, but are you sure you don't just love your small part of it? There's a lot more to this country than just your community.

When I say I hate this country I'm talking about the whole thing. The aggregate, the sum of all its parts, the good and the bad. There are good things about this country but they are outnumbered by the bad. For every good person, there are ten terrible people.

>I just don’t know how the country can sustain itself, or if it even should.

It shouldn't. It's a lost cause.

I hate this fucking country so much.

>And I believe such a solution is within reach. In fact, I think I’ve stumbled upon an idea that could help us get there....I'm currently putting the finishing touches on the concept and plan to publish it in the coming days. This article serves as a prelude

Lol, k. Can't wait to hear this great solution.

It's hard to get two sides to come to an agreement on something when one side is totally irrational.

Everything's stupid and nothing matters.

>The US and allies control WTO, and China was only allowed trade on WTO terms after they accepted to follow the WTO standards, basically designed by USA

That means nothing, anymore. Those standards are meaningless, China holds most of cards, now. Any attempts to reign in China have been half hearted at best, and often undermined by the US itself. As tough as people have tried to sound in their rhetoric about China, the fact is American corporations and consumers continue to do business with them because it's just too good of a deal for them.

>and American politicians have openly stated how they need to prevent China from expanding their influence.

Well, they have failed, spectacularly, and that was true LONG before even Trump's first term, let alone these tariffs.

This is the stupidest article I've read about the tariffs, and that's saying something because I've read some doozies.

The author makes it sound like the US and the rest of the world were building a coalition to take on Chinese control of the global economy, before Trump's tariffs came along and ruined everything. That's horse shit.

The article even mentions Vietnam specifically. Do they not know that Vietnam is also a Marxist-Leninist state? Vietnam has taken many cues from China. Vietnam is trying to become a manufacturing hub, similar to China, and the relationship that Vietnam has been building with the US is one of trade that is similar the relationship the US has with China: they (China/Vietnam) make the stuff, we (the US) buy the stuff.

>Macron referred to expected changes in Washington's foreign policy, citing the need to reduce reliance on the United States for security.

As an American, I also urge Europe to reduce its reliance on the US, for security or anything else. You're going to want to insulate yourselves as much as possible from my unbelievably stupid, and potentially very dangerous country.