u/SpaceCadet — DefederateLemmyMl

They don't *have* nukes as such. They are prepositioned US owned nukes that remain under the custody of the USAF. The part of the base where the nukes are stored is strictly off limits to local personnel.

What makes them "shared", is that they are intended to be dropped by planes owned by the host country, and both the government of the host country as well as the US government need to give their authorization to activate and use them.

So you may as well just consider them as US nukes.

Communication is key

Sure, but honestly it sounds tiring if this kind of discussion is a recurring thing.

The rubel is massively devalued

The ruble's exchange rate is on the level of 2020-2021: 0,011 euro to the ruble. Shows how much you know.

Also, most of the military production is internal... so the exchange rate of the ruble is meaningless to determine relative military strength, which is precisely why a PPP conversion is needed.

Then move troops there

We can't put all our troops in the Baltics, nevermind the fact that we don't have all that much *troops* and ammunition. Most of our money is spent on high tech weapons in limited numbers.

The European NATO members already outspend Russia in terms of military investments

Not really.

In terms of Euros spent, yes, we outspend them, but when adjusted for purchasing power we're scarily close to parity: 100 rubles in Russia buys you a lot more than 1 euro in Europe. And our militaries are hopelessly fragmented, and behind in the rearming race.

Anders Puck Nielsen has a very informative video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxq-TvgNCBU

1. Russia doesn't need to make it into Germany to make it a disaster for all of Europe.

2. Sure, NATO as a whole is bigger than Russia, but the troops and equipment are mostly not at the eastern border where the fighting would take place. We certainly don't have anything near the size of the Ukrainian army stationed in the Baltics. Take the US out of the equation, because let's be honest: under Trump they're not going to stand up for Europe, and the military balance suddenly looks a lot less favorable. I'm not so sure the European NATO states could mount an effective and timely response to an incursion into the Baltic states, or into Poland around the Suwalki gap.

Basically: Si vis pacem, para bellum