1 points ·
I think they all have bomb shelters there and an early alert system
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Color
Joined
1 points ·
I think they all have bomb shelters there and an early alert system
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Color
2 points ·
18% of israel is still 1.8 million people, that is a lot of people.
12 points ·
Idk, I think we should have sympathy for people being kill because of war at all times.
I don't know who lived in the place that was bombed there, but unless I have reason to believe that that person is somehow responsible for the genocide, why would I hate them?
Israel is obviously filled with genocidal people, and those who support genocide are not going to get my sympathy, but there are those who are actively fighting it even. So I do feel sympathy for innocent people dying because of genocidal governments and their need to bomb every living thing around them.
3 points ·
The balls to brains ration must be close to infinite on the person who filmed this.
14 points ·
Pretty simple. Currently not all nations have nukes, out of those who have, a few have enough to completely destroy a rival nation. This means that the nations with the big nuke stocks are the ones calling the shots as to who should have nukes and how much. Iran being mostly against the US is not allowed nukes, Israel being mostly a US ally is allowed nukes.
This is the unpolitical explanation.
3 points ·
I guess it's easy to say behind a keyboard, but still feels fucked up, was that really the lesser evil?
27 points ·
I get making deals to acquire useful information, but immunity? The deals should have been life in prison instead of execution.
32 points ·
I guess even a crazy stupid clock is accurate sometimes
2 points ·
Annex as in make it part of Israel instead of the west bank? Would that involve forcibly removing current residents and inserting Israelis into their homes?
1 points ·
Sure, because as everyone knows, theses cases are so clear cut and there is alwas a good side that does no wrong and a bad side that does only wrong.
Maybe you are too close to the problem, I don't know your story, but from the side it is obvious that the 7.10 was hate fueled terrorism (you can see them even shooting friendly dogs) just as it is clear that right now there is a genocide going on.
2 points ·
Lick it!
1 points ·
What a load of BS. It was a terrorist attack on civilians.
The Israel-Palestine conflict has been goibg on for long, Israel is to blame for a lot of it, some of the attacks by Hamas can be categorized as resistance, the 7.10 was a pure terrorist attack, no two ways about it.
Targeting civilians based on which side of the border they reside in is a terrorist attack, this applies to both sides. On the 7th Hamas murdered who ever they found, including Muslims.
42 points ·
It's a joke...
Votes were always political BS, they ban a bunch of very legitimate things like the pride flag and Palestine flag, yet they don't mind having a country in the process of committing genocide in it.
Look, the 7.10 was terrible, Israel had every right to fight back. But genocide is genocide and it is not self defense.
Fuck Hamas, fuck Israel and fuck the Eurovision.
15 points ·
Seems like it since apparently the international court is a joke.
-10 points ·
Without getting into politics, this looks really suspicious. They claim she said that but there is no qoute proof or anything, this entire article is only a few paragraphs...
Again, not gonna get into it all but why share news that are basically the same as a random tweet
2 points ·
The art of the deal 🤝
Of course the art being along the lines of
::: spoiler NSFW
:::
3 points ·
Anyone who follows a bit of the politics in the Israeli government over the last few years is probably not that shocked. This *removed* is one of the cruelest most dangerous people in the Israeli government.
She has publicly stated that is more important to "flatten"
(ie genocide and complete destruction) gaza so that Jews can go live there (something about a religiously important location there) than save the Israeli hostages. She isn't even your classic genocidal racist fuck, she is the embodiment of the evils of religion.
So to tell you that I'm shocked she raped a kid? Nah, the jewish bible actually does forbid all kinds of legitimate sex acts such as masturbation and homosexuality, but it does not say anything specifically about children, what it does say is that you are an adult past 12 for girls and past 13 for boys.
So even without any interpretation tricks, the hebrew bible allows for an adult to have sex with a 12 yo girl, which is rape. And with some interpretation tricks some claim that sex with a child before coming of age is not really sex as they are not yet sexual beings or some BS like that.
To clearify, I don't support any religion, they are all bad IMO, but I do recognize that most religious people are not extremists and tend to share most of the morals of their time over the morals of their religion.
8 points ·
Good argument, but you misspelled Israel as "isreal" haha, I voided your argument /s(because I don't even want strangers to think I'm serious)
3 points ·
Even if you are right and nothing is a worthy comparison. Let me ask you a somewhat practical and important moral question:
If I murdered 10 people by shooting them in the head because they are black
Or if I murdered 10 people by slowly torturing them until they die from shock, this time it had nothing to do with who they are, just that I want to do this to someone.
What is worse? A terrible motivation or a terrible outcome?
And now that I asked that, maybe you are thinking that it is kind of a moot point, both are horrible, for both I should be in jail for life if not executed, right?
So we all can agree that out of all of the horrific things possible, genocide is one of the worst. A genocide is already hitting max on the horrifying scale, practically speaking, Hitler should have been in jail for life ir executed, but just because what Netanyahu is doing is not as horrific as the Holocaust, does not mean he shouldn't also be in jail for life or executed, right?
And what would be the benifit of keeping the Holocaust in a category of it's own? Does comparing it to something else that basically hits the max on the horrifying scale really reduces from the horrifying reality of the Holocaust?
For the sake of making a better world, I think comparing genocides to genocides, no matter the scale, no matter the horrificness, is the right way to make sure that people understand that **any genocide is already as horrifying as it gets**
And one last point that I think really drives it home. On the individual level do you think it matters? Does a starving, scared, injured, homeless, orphaned child cares if he is part of the Holocaust or the Gaza genocide? If you take a survivor from each, would you be able to say who is more deeply scarred?