u/FunnyUsername — Captain Poofter

so everyone who is alive now BECAUSE of all that information doesn't deserve their life because of your ethical standards? we can agree to disagree.

i am a carnivore. i eat flesh. i have zero disillusionment about what life and it's atrocities actually are. enjoy your high horse, I won't be responding to you anymore.

edit: did you know particle board was invented by the nazis? ever buy any build it yourself furniture? better throw it out. ever drink a fanta soda?

now you're just going in outlandish directions. if you don't have the nuance to distinguish between not letting lives go to waste and murder, then have a good day.

I'm not kidding anyone, I'm specifically saying the information was valuable enough to give them what they wanted. that's all

it is not direct lives, so there is no source. we learned information such as the exact temperature a human body dies when frozen, and things that advanced organ sciences and transplants. there's simply no way to calculate the lives we've saved or improved from obtaining the information because it is so far reaching.

if we didn't get that information, more people would have died. "justice" may have missed out, but justice doesn't save any lives in this scenario. it's a super fucked up situation, but i do believe getting that information was the best possible outcome. at least *some* good came from the suffering of the victims this way. it's a hard pill to swallow, but nature is a *removed*, we're all only animals, and there is no god.

they didn't really have the cards. usa doesn't wanna give immunity? no experiment results. what are they gunna do? have another genocide just for science? it was literally the only chance for this information, and they had to give the worst humans that ever existed immunity to get it. it sure is a fucked situation and really makes you think. what god?

...pardon me??