u/Count042

Irans retaliatory strikes defending against Israel's unjustified cowardly sneak attack to start a fight the Israelis were to weak to win.

There, I fixed the title for you.

He absolutely redefined to justify killing children. Bush didn't do that. It was used, under Bush, to justify torture and jailing of adults.

Obama re-invented it for his purposes. The purpose being to kill children without consequence.

In my mind, that definitional change is significant enough that he owns a lot of that blame.

Fucking goddammit, he redefined the word to justify killing children. Why do you defend that?

EDIT: Removed indirect articles for easier readability, content is the same.

It was under Bush to justify imprisoning civilians. Bush was all for direct war actions.

Obama massively increased bombings and drone bombings to pull out combat troops and would do stuff like double tap weddings. To lower the number of civilian deaths, Obama declared any male over the age of 14 to be, by definition, an enemy combatant.

The person you responded to was correct, though a bit imprecise with their words.

Why would you have sympathy for Israel attacking without provocation a state that turned out to be stronger than they thought?

The staffers helped murder 5 million people.

25 trucks a day is still starvation conditions for most people.

Maybe we shouldn't give attention or awards to genocidal fucks actively engaged in genocide and should disrupt their attempts to garner positive attention.

You know, using the exact same justification you used to not give attention to someone disrupting a sports game, a much less important thing then FUCKING GENOCIDE.

I started to down vote you, then I saw your username and was like "what?!"

Then I reread your first C.

Well done.

This isn't a legacy of slavery.

This is straight up slavery. They enslaved her.

The Japanese government won't acknowledge many of its war crimes or paid reparations to its still living victims.

If Germany said the Holocaust never happened, that would reflect very poorly on the German citizens that continue to elect the Holocaust denying government officials and you would be justified in asking German tourists if they acknowledged the Holocaust.

I don't know why you are being down voted.

I love that the Japanese are treating Israeli's as members of the apartheid genocidal state that they are.

Japan also hasn't recognized or paid reparations for many of the horrendous war crimes they've committed themselves.

Both things can be true at the same time.

2 years and 8 months for men?

My love for round numbers is offended.

If my culture had a term 'n-wordass' I would not have the unmitigated gall to try and argue it wasn't racist.

Seriously, what is wrong with you?

Oh, that's right, you're trying to defend the use of an obviously racist term. You're a racist. That's what is wrong with you.

1. Stylist logical fallacy to ever come about solely to justify American war mongering. Use your fucking brain and try to have a memory that lasts longer than 5 minutes.

2. What do you think happens to the Russian people? America did this in the 90's when the Russian people were stupid enough to trust America. The average life expectency for Russian men dropped 20 years. Millions died.

I swear to god, Larry Summers is probably the most evil man still alive now that Kissinger is dead. Most horrible things, not associated with war, can be traced back to him.

I honestly have no idea why liberals and conservatives love this racist sexist duck bag. He's also the one that was heading up Harvard when he stated that women were genetically less capable then men at math and science.

3. Not bullshit. I just happen to have a functional memory and don't hate the daily enemy people when my countries media tells me to. You might want to try that, as well as trying to actually remember events that happened longer than 6 months ago.

EDIT: I was going to fix the formatting issue, but the Larry Summers bit does stand on it's own.

I don't need to respond with anything. The racism is absolutely clear to anyone reading your words.

I'm also willing to bet you don't feel the same way about the English.

If you moved to the slave states before the civil war, you would absolutely be one of those assholes even if you didn't enslave someone, or were in charge.

If you were a white South African during the apartheid years, and didn't leave as soon as possible EDIT: or fight the apartheid state, you were one of those assholes.

If you were a white Rhodesian... Actually, for this one, you were just an asshole, no qualifications.

That'd be a nice world to live in. I'd love to live there.

Jesus. You're just going straight fucking racist here, but you're too historically ignorant to be aware of it.

I'm guessing it was intentional that you didn't touch the British empire. There is no analysis you can do that would have any other government kill more people than the British empire. Should TERF Island "Be destroyed by all means short of overt, kinetic war"?

I mean, there is actual continuity between the current British Government and the British Empire. The Russian government doesn't have anywhere near the same level of continuity.

And I am arguing in good faith. You may not enjoy the cognitive dissonance of having someone point out your obvious racism, but that doesn't make me not believe you're a racist that gets off on feeling self righteous. That is something I truly believe.

Just like the US killed far more Iraqi and Afghani's than Russia killed Ukrainians. SO FAR. That may eventually not be true anymore, but it is an absolute fact now. And facts aren't a bad faith argument.

You know what is a bad faith argument? Ignoring the points in the comment that you are responding to that prove you're either wrong or racistly holding a double standard based on ... something? That is also something I absolutely believe and am arguing in good faith. Although, I suspect that you don't actually know what "bad faith" means.

You know what is also a bad faith argument? Calling someone insane for a strawman argument that you made up. I didn't claim America kill more than 20 million people worldwide. What I did state was that the US kill more Iraqis and Afghani's than Russia killed Ukrainians. Both were illegal invasions.

You don't care about justice. Stop pretending you do.

EDIT:

Iraq - Afghanistan: 4 million

Vietnam - Korea: 5 million

The Jakarta Method: 1 million

There's at least half of the number that you think justifies destroying a nation that isn't related to the one you're talking about.

What percentage of 20 million deaths crosses the threshold you have for countries that should be destroyed?

The US killed more people in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I have no problem with your statement, but unless it applies to the US, I have to wonder why.

Like, is it the skin color of the people Russia killed vs the skin color of the people the US killed?

Probably nobody on earth is responsible for more death then the British empire.

Do you hold the same views of Britain?

Edit: to be clear, I'm not the person that down voted your comment.

EDIT EDIT: I'm downvoting you now when you doubled down on the racism.

So you're a Nazi.

People that don't care about the ongoing genocide of 2.8 million people, most of whom were children, and don't care they're being slaughtered because of the action of less then 1% of the population are Nazis who are okay with genocide.

You don't have a problem with genocide, just the people being genocided.

You're a Nazi.