u/Capricorn_Geriatric

Also, even *if* a few members organize themselves to do that, that doesn't mean the entire organization supports it or is behind it.

Largely depends on the country. Most countries prosecute only crimes commited in their territory (including ships/planes in/above international waters sailing/flying under their flag) or sometimes even by their citizens outside it. There are always exceptions to these rules. As per the meme, think of them more as guidelines that are followed most of the time.

That being said, this example is within the EU, meaning other EU members are obliged to arrest the person and send then to the country that asked for them. There are also various other extradition treaties under which the person can be brought before Dutch courts.

Also, AFAIK 'capital' crimes in US lingo are those punishable by death. Since no EU members and only one country in Europe outside it actively retains death as a valid penalty for a crime, this would be closer to a felony in the US. The EU is similar to the US in that regard - EU member states are obliged just like US states to turn over people with a properly published arrest warrant. However, there are no "federal" courts in the EU and "federal" crimes like in the US, at least not in the way as they exist in the US.

And as a poor person, every cent counts. That's why you claim the maximum (or a bit more than you think you'll ve given), since it's the government's job to actually calculate how much you're "better off" than the other person and adjust the rates accordingly. Ideally, you'd just request *something* and get that something - you shouldn't have to be the one to decide how miserable your misery is compared to other miseries.

Someone on benefits, *especially* someone caring for their sick child shouldn't be an accounting expert. This isn't the US, where 15 year olds are expected to do their own taxes (and pay a $15.000 service that does about 10% of the work for you), and *even in the US* if you fuck up the IRS mostly just tells you to cover the difference.

So, this system of "you *dared* to ask for ONE CENT MORE? Now you owe me ***ALL*** back" is not only asinine, but it doesn't even fly in the US of all places.

If we want to punish people, then ask for, say, 2% interest on the overclaim. Taking ***ALL*** is more discriminatiry, since it rewards trying to claim an ungodly amount and hoping one of your £15k claims somehow goes under the radar.

All in all, not a good system.

Using something proportional would be a progressivs disincentive, and it will keep actual "accidental" overclaimants better off than malicious ones.

He's the US VP.

I'd love if this was a joke.