*Permanently Deleted*
c/europe · u/zaxvenz@lemm.ee · 251 points
c/europe · u/zaxvenz@lemm.ee · 251 points
u/jenesaisquoi@feddit.org · 1 points
Nah. Very few nations have the capability to strike satellites.
u/muelltonne@feddit.org · 2 points
That single satellite is toast at the start of every major conflict
u/phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 3 points
No, because for 99% of applications byoubdont need low latency satellite internet. A single geostationary satellite works wonders
u/Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world · 0 points
StarLink does fiber back haul from base stations. So it's either your Telco spending the money or StarLink. Your Telco doesn't want to spend the money because it comes from customers and would require rate hikes that are regulated.
Whereas StarLink is spending its investor's money.
u/alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 points
We are comparing against Starlink, dude.
u/Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world · 4 points
Wireless trunking can do 10GBs . Fiber does 800GBs. Chaining more towers means more are funneled through that last 10GBs link.
u/alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -5 points
No, towers can be connected wirelessly with each other.
u/Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world · 6 points
Fiber needs to be run to the towers. It's easier to install more towers but it's still an expense.
u/jenesaisquoi@feddit.org · 1 points
Egypt? Where women are afraid to be outside their homes?
u/ChairmanMeow@programming.dev · 1 points
Morocco and Egypt are pretty well developed.
u/DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee · -5 points
[removed]
u/dabaldeagul@feddit.nl · 6 points
No, I think you mean 50 megabits per second. I'd consider 100mbit (megabits) average, 50 000 megabits, which is equal to 50 gigabits (or ⅛th of 50 000 mega*bytes*) would be ludicrously unnecessarily much for a residential connection today, and it'd be hard to find hardware to support it.
Just for reference:
I don't think your internet would be quite that fast, or at least you wouldn't be complaining about it 😅
u/DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee · 1 points
Oh I’m sorry I might be kind of an idiot in IT stuff. What I meant was 50.000 megabytes. Which is poor as hell. Even for developing countries.
Really, all I know is that my connection sucks and that I’m on the lowest posisible speed.
u/dabaldeagul@feddit.nl · 7 points
The confusion/sarcasm is because you say 50k mbit --> 50 000 mbit --> 50 gbit.
u/DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee · 7 points
Lmao. I wish. I am on a 50 MBIT (not GBIT) connection. And yes. I want more. Please give me just a few crumbs.
u/notfromhere@lemmy.one · 4 points
You’re on a 50 Gbps connection and you want more?
u/Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org · 3 points
Wow, _even_ some african nations huh?
u/DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee · 19 points
As a German I hear you. Internet is an actual embarrassment over here. I’m on a 50k Mbit connection and that’s the most they can offer me. 100k is out of question, they told me to ask again in 2028.
Even some African nations probably have better internet than this. Germany is the third richest country by gdp btw.
u/alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -3 points
With modern wireless technology, fiber isn't even necessary. 5G is cheap and easy.
u/fdrc_lm@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 points
They will literally do everything except just installing freaking fiber cables
u/DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee · 81 points
Fuck Starlink. Europe is working on its own alternative and it would be actual traitor behaviour to still make a Starlink contract. If anything it should be banned.
Fuck Elon Musk. I want to see him crying and poor. Or „worse“. ☺️🪦💀
u/nahostdeutschland@feddit.org · 10 points
Every major powerblock will build their own constellation. The need is there, but there is no way that the militaries will give that amount of control to the USA & Musk now. Musk switched of starlink in a critical phase for Ukraine and that was the dead of the program for militaries outside of the USA
u/DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 points
Shocking. I thought fascists would have the back of other fascists .